6 types of organizational structures for businesses

Explore the different types of organizational structures.

Colorful flowchart diagram with interconnected boxes on a tilted whiteboard against a blue background.

If “organizational structure” makes you picture a cold corporate ladder—with the boss at the top and everyone else scrambling for air—we get you. But that’s only one version of the story.

How a company designs its chain of command affects its entire existence from top to bottom. Some teams thrive with clear hierarchies, while others move faster with flat or flexible models. What matters most is finding the structure that supports the way your team works best.

And in a global or remote setting, the right organizational structure becomes even more important—helping teams stay aligned across time zones, cultures, and continents.

In this guide, we’ll explain the different types of organizational structures and the foundational elements they all have in common.

Looking for great global talent? With vetted partners and 1:1 support, the Oyster Talent Network will help you find the right talent across roles, skills, and locations.

What is an organizational structure?

An organizational structure depicts (in an organizational chart) a company’s personnel architecture: who does what, who works on what team, who reports to whom, and how the whole operation functions. Like a map or a family tree, it illustrates the company’s hierarchy and helps employees see where they fit. That’s especially helpful in large companies with multiple locations or remote teams working across borders, where opportunities for in-person interaction are limited.

When company leaders design their organizational structure with intention and a clear understanding of the company’s goals, its people, and their skills, it gives employees clarity around their roles, goals, and reporting lines. People know what their job involves compared to their coworkers, who they report to, who that person reports to, and how their work connects to the bigger picture.

5 elements of an organizational structure

Behind every organizational structure are five core elements that shape how a company actually operates. These components influence how employees share responsibilities, how teams relate to each other, and how work flows from start to finish.

1. Work specialization

Work specialization means dividing tasks among employees based on their roles—and the areas where they’re sure to shine. Instead of one person handling an entire project from start to finish, managers split the work into smaller, more specific responsibilities that match each person’s strengths. That way, employees spend more time doing what they’re good at—often making the work more enjoyable and less overwhelming.

2. Departmentation

Work specialization focuses on what each person does. Departmentation shapes how people come together as teams. Leadership organizes employees by function, skill set, location, or customer group. For example, a company might create departments like marketing, finance, or operations—or build teams based on region.

Some businesses, especially startups, use matrix structures that combine two approaches—like function and geography—so employees report to more than one manager. It gives teams more flexibility and helps them balance daily work with bigger-picture goals.

3. Chain of command

The chain of command defines a company’s hierarchy—who reports to whom and how decisions flow. A well-designed structure supports autonomy by giving employees a clear sense of who decides what, including the decisions they own. That clarity builds accountability, as everyone understands their responsibilities and how their role fits into the team. It also streamlines communication—people know where to go with questions, what to escalate, and what they can handle without checking in first.

4. Span of control

Span of control refers to the number of employees who report directly to a single manager. A narrow span means managers work closely with fewer people, which allows them to offer more hands-on guidance and feedback. Conversely, a wider span gives employees more independence—but that means they manage their time and responsibilities with less oversight. The right balance between the two depends on factors like the management team's capacity, the team’s experience, and the complexity of the work. 

5. Formalization

Formalization makes everything from the other four elements official. It spells out how work divides across roles (specialization), how teams come together (departmentation), who reports to whom (chain of command), and how many people each manager supports (span of control). By setting clear rules and repeatable systems, formalization helps teams maintain consistency and preserve company culture—even as it grows or shifts direction. Some companies lean into more structure and predictability, while others leave more space for flexibility. The right approach depends on a company's size, pace, and industry.

6 types of organizational structures

Different teams work in different ways, so why shouldn’t they need different kinds of structure? Also, consider this: More options mean better chances of finding one that doesn’t just work—but works perfectly for you. Here are six common approaches to shape an organizational structure:

1. Functional organizational structure

A formal organizational structure groups employees into departments like marketing, public relations, and human resources. It's one of the most common approaches, offering clearly defined roles—but it can also create silos, making collaboration across teams and a cohesive company culture harder to maintain.

2. Divisional structure

The divisional structure organizes a company into segments based on things like customer types, product lines, or regions, with each division operating like its own mini-organization. Many companies combine this model with a functional structure—grouping teams by both what they do and what they focus on. For example, each division might have its own marketing, finance, and HR departments. This kind of hybrid setup helps companies stay focused on specialized work while still adapting to the needs of different markets or customer groups.

3. Matrix organizational structure

The matrix model blends functional and divisional structures. Employees often report to two managers—one for their department and one for the project or product they’re working on. This structure allows people to shift between projects as needed without leaving their core team. It also gives managers more flexibility to assign work based on what the business needs most. But when managers don’t align, employees can get caught in the middle—unsure whose direction to follow.

4. Hierarchical organizational structure

This traditional top-down model resembles a pyramid, with executives at the top and authority flowing through layers of management to frontline staff. Each person’s role, responsibilities, and authority is obvious, which brings consistency and accountability. But all those layers mean decisions need to pass through multiple people before anything moves forward. For the same reason, the hierarchical organizational structure can also make it harder for new ideas to surface or gain traction. And when too much control stays at the top, some employees might feel shut out, which can damage morale and momentum.

5. Flat structure

A flat structure uses fewer layers of management, creating direct lines between founders, executives, managers, and employees. Startups and small teams often use this model to promote efficiency, quick decision-making, and employee empowerment. However, it can become chaotic or unsustainable as the company grows without clear boundaries. For example, as a company scales, employees might have less direct access to founders or the CEO, creating difficulty for new executives and managers. 

6. Team-based organizational structure

In a team-based structure, employees work in small, semi-independent groups focused on specific projects or goals. Teams often set their own agendas and make decisions together, which often encourages innovation, ownership, and collaboration. But without strong coordination across teams, things can easily slip through the cracks—especially as the company grows.

3 factors that influence your organizational structure choice

Every organizational structure type has its pros and cons. There’s no one-size-fits-all—just the one that fits your team best. And that might change over time as your company grows and evolves. So, as you plan for today, keep an eye on tomorrow—and let these three factors help guide your choice.

  • Company size and stage: Startups often run well with flexible, informal setups. But as headcount grows and managers take on more direct reports, a more structured approach helps teams stay organized, aligned, and accountable. That added structure helps people understand how they fit in, who to go to, and how to keep moving without confusion.
  • Industry or sector: Some fields, like healthcare or utilities, require formal hierarchies to meet legal regulations. Others, like tech, often lean toward flatter or matrix setups that support agility and innovation. The right structure helps people do their best work—whether that means following strict protocols or having room to experiment and move fast.
  • Global or remote teams: Divisional or matrix structures help distributed teams balance local autonomy with company-wide connection. They give people the flexibility to shape how they work—based on their time zone, culture, and local needs—while still feeling like part of the larger team.

Grow with Oyster and the right structure

Whether you’re setting up your first org chart, rethinking reporting lines, or switching to a team-based model, Oyster helps you put structure into action—across borders. Oyster's all-in-one platform simplifies global team management, from hiring and payroll to compliance and benefits.

Need help finding the right people to fit your structure? Explore Oyster’s Talent Network to get matched with trusted partners and hire top talent—quickly, compliantly, and from anywhere.

Book a demo to learn more.

About Oyster

Oyster is a global employment platform designed to enable visionary HR leaders to find, engage, pay, manage, develop, and take care of a thriving distributed workforce. Oyster lets growing companies give valued international team members the experience they deserve, without the usual headaches and expense.

Oyster enables hiring anywhere in the world—with reliable, compliant payroll, and great local benefits and perks.

Text Link